The eight contradictions at the base of the referral of Carolina Kostner

Foto di Redazione
Photo information

Getty Images

Figure SkatingFigure skating - news

The eight contradictions at the base of the referral of Carolina Kostner

After five days of the anti-doping prosecutor of CONI has requested a suspension of four years and three months for Carolina Kostner, & egrave; interesting to analyze, as far as possible, the eight contradictions emerged between the depositions released at different times by Alex Schwarzer and the twenty-seven South Tyrol.

& Nbsp; A) L & rsquo; time of the control does not fit. According Kostner, would take place at 07:00 as she and l & rsquo; then partner were having breakfast. According to Schwarzer, instead, l & rsquo; inspector of WADA would be presented at 09:00, while both were still asleep. In this case, all doubts can & ograve; be dispelled by reference to what is written in the minutes of & rsquo; doping control officer (CDO) & Nbsp; B) Kostner claims not to remember a previous test conducted at Oberstdorf July 13, 2012, while Schwarzer says that he could not be aware of why & eacute; Test & egrave; was made at 06:00 in the morning with the couple woke up with a start at & rsquo; dawn. Also in this case, all doubt can & ograve; be dispelled by reference to what is written in the minutes of & rsquo; attendant to doping control, I've always felt the presence of Kostner in & rsquo; home & Nbsp; C) Kostner had stated that the prosecution Doping Schwarzer was not in possession of the keys of & rsquo; apartment Oberstdorf, but he has denied. In this case, the truth & agrave; pu & ograve; be known only by those directly involved, but today Kostner, a & rsquo; interview with the & ldquo; Made Daily & rdquo ;, explained that Schwarzer, when he was in Oberstdorf, had available a set of keys to move around independently & Nbsp; D) Kostner & egrave; sure that it never had dinner with Michael Didoni, technical Schwarzer referred in recent days, while according to Schwarzer there would be at least a dinner together. In this case, the people involved are three and they will know definitely how things went at least remembering the place where you would turn dinner. It remains difficult to understand the & rsquo; utility & agrave; the fact the purpose of the proceedings, except to confirm the & rsquo; any argument that a party is misleading and l & rsquo; no other & Nbsp; E) According Kostner, the first appearance of drug suspects in the refrigerator Oberstdorf dates back to February, while Schwarzer not before July. It is a fact that no potr & agrave; never be discharged, in less than a day at the beginning of the two versions match & Nbsp; F) Kosnter told the prosecutor sent a warning to Schwarzer, immediately after the failure to control, leaving the house of Oberstdorf. According Schwarzer, however, Kostner was undoubtedly altered for what happened, but would not ask him to go away. In the face of the statement, & egrave; difficult to understand who is on the side of truth & agrave ;, but a & rsquo; careful analysis of what happened in the hours following could be a key to understanding the situation G) According Kostner, Schwarzer could not have realized the presence of the inspectors WADA, were waiting in the car after the control failure, because & eacute; from the house you could not see the & rsquo; street corner where they were, while Schwarzer claims to have them clearly seen from the terrace of the house. It is a particularly easy with verifiable by going to the home of Kostner at Oberstdorf, more likely to have a relevance to the proceedings & Nbsp; H) Finally, regarding the phone call that would take place between Schwarzer and l & rsquo; inspector of WADA, Kostner says he's past his will & agrave; l & rsquo; inspector at Schwarzer. According Schwarzer, however, would be to insist in order that he & egrave; could personally talk to the & rsquo; inspector of WADA. Unless l & rsquo; inspector of WADA did not receive what was happening, did not unlikely in light of the dynamics of the call, only the people involved can be aware of what really happened & Nbsp; Specifically, in light of the contradictions that emerged, the prosecutor doping CONI has requested a sentence of four years to stop because Kostner would provide aid to Schwarzer in & rsquo; evade controtto doping Oberstdorf lying all & rsquo; inspector (WADA doping contol officer) on two occasions. In one case, denying the presence of Schwarzer in the home and in & rsquo; another denying that the machine Schwarzer was not parked in the yard next door. Also, would request a & rsquo; additional penalty of three months because of & rsquo; failure to report the relationship between the doctor and Schwarzer inhibited Michele Ferrari, the twenty-seven South Tyrolean claimed not to know. Meanwhile, the story & egrave; become public, to the point that insiders and have not begun to investigate what happened placing doubt on congruit & agrave; penalty request. It should also recorded the first intervention of the Ice Sports Federation, by the mouth of President Andra Gios: & rdquo; & egrave Certainly; an unpleasant affair: we are talking about a & rsquo; athlete & egrave; was always an example of fairness, admired by all and that the world envies. As a man and President, I am absolutely certain of the goodness & agrave; intentions and good faith of Carolina. By the Federation and my avr & agrave; all l & rsquo; backing and support it deserves, confident that this matter can be resolved positively for our athlete, his family and the Italian sports & rdquo ;. Today, I also came the first statements of Carolina Kostner, who, after returning from a Tourn & egrave; and the United States gave a long interview with Beatrice Borromeo de & ldquo; The Daily & rdquo ;.
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
2
Social media engagement