Miller case: HEAD challenges the jurisdiction of the California

From an excerpt of defense memorandum prepared by the Head and published on the Twitter profile by investigative journalist for the New York Daily News, Nathaniel Vinton, emerges one of the points on which the lawyers of the manufacturer will point in the proceedings they filed by Bode Miller.

Thursday 20 October 2016 3 minutes reading time

The skier, currently bound by a contract with HEAD which provides that it can not be used in competition other technical material to the end of the season that is about to begin, in order to tie in Bomber Ski which & egrave; He became ambassador and return to gi & agrave races; now has, in fact, sued HEAD at the Court of the State of California, where he resides and only state that in the recent past has canceled, according to the right to work, the application of clauses which prevent the Silicon Valley manager to accept a position at rival companies. The extract published from Vinton, in the image below, it is clear that the Head of Legal intend to question the jurisdiction of California on the issue to avoid a judgment that could reserve bitter surprises. It seeks to show, first of all, as the residence of Bode Miller in California is fictitious: "The social media posts show how Miller spends little time in California, but rather moves between New Hampshire, Kentucky, skiing in Colorado, Chile and Austria and promotes in New York its shareholding nell''azienda Aztech Mountain clothing ". Although not fully readable in the excerpt, the second point to attack the jurisdiction Californian & egrave; alleging that the matter does not concern the activities & agrave; Head of the California branch. & Nbsp; & Nbsp;

Social media engagement