The lawyer Johaug: First judgment perhaps in January. And the biological passport supports the thesis random dell''assunzione

Il legale di Johaug: “Prima sentenza forse a gennaio”. E il passaporto biologico supporta la tesi dell'assunzione casuale
Photo information

Getty Images

Nordic SkiingCross-country skiing - Norway

The lawyer Johaug: First judgment perhaps in January. And the biological passport supports the thesis random dell''assunzione

A little less than two weeks after taking the defense of Therese Johaug, Christian B. Hjort has agreed to a long interview with the newspaper Verdens Gang, which has analyzed the status of each other.

L & rsquo; last piece to the puzzle had joined & egrave; that of the biological passport, which would seem to confirm the & rsquo; occasionalit & agrave; dell & rsquo; taking Clostebol. This does not exclude the possible negligence of the & rsquo; athlete, but makes very little plausible systematic doping theories advanced by some media. According to the & rsquo; Hjort lawyer, the point on which the inverter & agrave; the process will be & agrave; perci memorize options another: & ldquo; You Tratter & agrave; essentially to determine whether Therese've investigated enough before taking the drug, specifically asking your doctor if it ran or less risk, or whether it was obliged to investigate pi & ugrave; deeply. My opinion & egrave; that you have done everything we memorize options it was reasonable to expect & rdquo ;. One of the least clear of each other node & egrave; l & rsquo; big mistake that a respected professional long course like Dr. Bendiksen committed. & Ldquo; One of the great questions & egrave; as did a sports physician d & rsquo; experience as Bendiksen to be wrong cos & igrave; blatantly & rdquo ;, he admitted Hjort. & Ldquo; L & rsquo; another & egrave; as Therese was unable to see the & rsquo; alert & ldquo; & rdquo Doping; on the box. D & rsquo; other hand, all the alternative explanation to that given by doctor and athlete & ndash; those under which she would buy the drug or person would deliberately doped & ndash; do not seem plausible & rdquo ;. About the date of the first judgment on the case, Hjort & egrave; I believe it can get for January 2017. L & rsquo; lawyer anyway reiterated the & rsquo; hope that the matter can be concluded as soon as possible. One aspect that the legal Johaug is particularly frustrating & egrave; the proliferation of judgments not sufficiently qualified: & ldquo; I understand that the case has aroused the & rsquo; interest of many people and that many want to have their say. To memorize options I'm tired of listening to the opinions of those who, without any title, stands for expert not only regulations, but also to us memorize options that & egrave; actually happened & rdquo ;. VG has also raised the issue of the recent case Sundby. & Egrave; It was forecast that the former can play against the Johaug, pushing a pi & ugrave judgment; severe, in order to silence criticism. & Ldquo; The case of Therese Johaug must be assessed in a completely independent from that of Sundby. Told us memorize options ;, I realize the pressure on & rsquo; Anti-Doping Agency and the Norwegian court that will have & agrave; choose & rdquo ;, said l & rsquo; lawyer about it. Hjort remains optimistic on & rsquo; outcome of the story: & ldquo; Therese explained openly and honestly we memorize options that & egrave; It happened. I am convinced that the veracity & agrave; than told verr & agrave; Also recognized in court as soon as all the items will be acquired & rdquo ;.
#FISCROSSCOUNTRY FISCROSSCOUNTRY #SCIDIFONDO
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
2
Social media engagement